Thévenin & Norton Equivalents#

Any linear circuit, no matter how complex, can be replaced by a simple equivalent as seen from two terminals: a voltage source in series with a resistance (Thévenin) or a current source in parallel with a resistance (Norton). This is one of the most powerful simplification tools in circuit analysis.

Thévenin Equivalent#

From any two terminals, a linear circuit looks like:

  • V_th — The open-circuit voltage (voltage at the terminals with nothing connected)
  • R_th — The equivalent resistance seen looking back into the circuit (with all independent sources turned off: voltage sources replaced by short circuits, current sources replaced by open circuits)

The load sees V_th in series with R_th. That’s it.

Finding V_th#

  1. Remove the load from the two terminals
  2. Calculate (or measure) the open-circuit voltage between the terminals
  3. That’s V_th

Finding R_th#

Method 1 (Source deactivation): Turn off all independent sources. Replace voltage sources with short circuits, current sources with open circuits. Calculate the equivalent resistance seen from the terminals.

Method 2 (Short-circuit current): Find the short-circuit current I_sc at the terminals (wire the terminals together and calculate the current). Then R_th = V_th / I_sc.

Method 3 (Test source): Apply a test voltage V_test at the terminals and calculate the resulting current I_test. Then R_th = V_test / I_test. (This is the standard approach when dependent sources are present, since they can’t just be “turned off.”)

Norton Equivalent#

Same circuit, different representation:

  • I_n — The short-circuit current (current between the terminals when shorted)
  • R_n — Same as R_th (the equivalent resistance is identical)

I_n = V_th / R_th. The two representations are completely interchangeable.

When to Use Which#

  • Thévenin — When the source is “voltage-like” (stiff voltage, significant source impedance). Power supplies, signal sources, sensor outputs
  • Norton — When the source is “current-like” (stiff current, high parallel impedance). Current mirrors, photodiodes, some sensor types

In practice, Thévenin is more commonly used because most sources in electronics are voltage sources.

Practical Applications#

Understanding Source-Load Interaction#

Once the Thévenin equivalent is known:

  • Loaded output voltage: V_out = V_th × R_load / (R_th + R_load)
  • Load current: I_load = V_th / (R_th + R_load)
  • How much the output drops under load: The ratio R_th / R_load indicates the regulation. Small ratio = stiff source = small drop

Maximum Power Transfer#

Maximum power to the load occurs when R_load = R_th. The load gets V_th / 2 volts and power = V_th² / (4 × R_th).

This is important in RF (50 Ω matching) and audio (impedance matching). It’s generally NOT the goal in power delivery, where maximum efficiency (R_load » R_th) is preferred over maximum power transfer.

Output Impedance Measurement#

To find the output impedance of a real circuit (amplifier, power supply, etc.):

  1. Measure the open-circuit output voltage (no load): V_oc
  2. Connect a known load R_load and measure the loaded voltage: V_loaded
  3. Calculate: R_out = R_load × (V_oc - V_loaded) / V_loaded

This is the practical, bench-measurable version of finding R_th.

Linearity Requirement#

Thévenin and Norton equivalents only apply to linear circuits. The circuit must obey superposition — output is proportional to input, and the effect of multiple sources is the sum of individual effects.

Nonlinear elements (diodes, transistors in large-signal operation, saturated transformers) break linearity. Thévenin/Norton equivalents can still be used:

  • At a specific operating point (small-signal analysis)
  • For the linear portion of a circuit, treating nonlinear elements as separate
  • As an approximation when the operating range is small enough to be approximately linear

Limits of Abstraction#

The Thévenin/Norton equivalent captures the DC or single-frequency behavior perfectly. But:

  • Frequency dependence — Real circuits have impedance that varies with frequency. R_th becomes Z_th(f), and a single number doesn’t capture the full picture. At DC or a single frequency, it works. Over a range of frequencies, the full impedance vs. frequency characteristic is needed
  • Noise — R_th generates thermal noise. The equivalent circuit’s noise behavior matches the real circuit’s only if the noise source is included (V_noise = √(4kTR_th × B))
  • Nonlinearity — As noted above, the equivalent is only valid in the linear operating region
  • Dynamic behavior — Thévenin gives the steady-state equivalent. Transient behavior (capacitive and inductive storage elements) requires more than a single R and V

Tips#

  • Use Thévenin equivalents to simplify complex networks before analyzing load behavior
  • The method works for finding the source impedance of any circuit — treat it as a black box and measure V_oc and V_loaded
  • For frequency-dependent analysis, calculate Z_th at each frequency of interest

Caveats#

  • Dependent sources can’t be “turned off” — When finding R_th, only deactivate independent sources. Dependent sources stay active. Use the test-source method instead
  • R_th is not always resistive — In AC circuits, Z_th can be complex (resistive + reactive). The “resistance” is actually an impedance
  • Negative R_th means instability — Some active circuits present negative output impedance in certain frequency ranges. This can cause oscillation when connected to certain loads. If measured R_th comes out negative, investigate stability
  • Don’t confuse open-circuit voltage with nominal voltage — A 9 V battery’s V_th is 9 V only when fresh and unloaded. Under load, the terminal voltage drops by I × R_internal. The “9 V” on the label is the nominal (approximately open-circuit) voltage

In Practice#

  • Output voltage that drops significantly under load indicates high source impedance — calculate R_th from the voltage drop
  • A circuit that works unloaded but fails under load often has excessive output impedance for the intended load
  • Measured output impedance higher than expected suggests additional series resistance in the circuit (wiring, contact resistance, component degradation)
  • Two circuits that should have the same output impedance but measure differently indicate a fault or difference in one of them